We’ve recently seen a number of news stories with disturbing figures about the rising cost of college education, and the growing inability of graduates to pay off the debt they incur from student loans. In fact, recent studies reveal that student loan debt now exceeds credit card debt in the U.S.!

All of this has motivated many grandparents to find a way to help pay for their grandchildren’s college education. According to this article in the Wall Street Journal “Recent tax-law changes are making it easier for families to help pay education bills for multiple grandchildren and even future generations. But grandparents have to make some tough decisions first.”

For grandparents whose grandchildren are already in school there may be fewer tough decisions to make, these grandparents will find it easy to “pay an unlimited amount of tuition directly to an accredited school for their grandchildren’s education without incurring any gift tax or using their exemption.” Additionally, under the annual gift tax exclusion, anybody—including grandparents—can “give up to $13,000 to an unlimited number of people each year free of tax.”

Grandparents with younger grandchildren are finding that they also now have more options if they want to contribute to their grandchild’s future college education. “Under the Tax Relief Act of 2010, the federal gift-tax exemption increases to $5 million from $1 million for individuals, as does the exemption for the generation-skipping tax… The changes make it easier to pass along money for education to future generations free of taxes—at least through 2012, after which the exemption is scheduled to revert to $1 million.” The only question is how is the best way to set aside the money until the child reaches college age?

The most popular method right now is for the grandparent to set up or contribute to a 529 College Savings plan for their grandchild. “Assets you contribute to a 529 account are no longer part of your estate. If you are the account owner, you can withdraw the assets later without penalty.” However, care must be taken with 529 plans because “When the assets are withdrawn they will be counted [for tax purposes] as the student’s income.”

Other options for savings include “setting up a ‘pot trust,’ or dynasty trust, which names all of the grandchildren, including any future babies, as beneficiaries. The length of such a trust varies by state but generally can serve at least a few generations of college students.” Of course setting up a trust with such a long intended duration means choosing a trustee who is likely to outlive you. Many grantors choose one of their own children (a parent, aunt or uncle of their grandchildren) or a trusted financial advisor, although corporate trustees (such as a bank) are also an option.

If you are interested in contributing in some way to your grandchildren’s college education please contact our office—we can help you understand your options and choose the one that’s best for you and your family.

Share on Facebook

News sources such as the Washington Post entertainment section promise that this summer will be flush with celebrity newborns and proud mamas and papas. Some of the stars expecting additions to their families include Natalie Portman, Kate Hudson, Jennifer Connelly and more. Here at our office we wonder how many of these new parents will remember to update their wills or estate plans after the birth of their child… and how many of our readers have remembered (or will remember, if they are currently expecting a new child or grandchild) to update their own estate plans after an addition to their families.

Every parent knows that the time after the birth of a new baby can be a tired, busy and chaotic transition, and updating their estate plan is probably the last thing on any new parent’s mind. But after the first few months, when things have calmed down and you’ve settled into a routine, updating your estate plan to include and provide for your new little one should take top priority.

Here are a few things new parents will want to consider as they prepare to update their estate plan:

• Guardians for your child. Who are the people who will raise your child if the unthinkable should happen to you and your spouse? Many people choose close family members, others choose trusted friends.
• Keep your child’s inheritance in trust. Settling your entire estate on a 5, 10 or 16 year old is never a good idea. Consider instead creating a trust for your child which will provide for him until he reaches maturity.
• Trustees of your child’s inheritance. Who do you trust to invest and distribute the estate for your child while she is still a minor? Some parents choose to have the guardians also serve as trustees; others prefer to nominate separate trustees and guardians who will work together, providing a natural system of checks and balances.
• Providing for your child’s special needs. If your child has special needs he will need special planning to ensure that his needs continue to be provided for. Ask us (or your own local estate planning attorney) about a special needs trust.

Guardians, trustees, trusts and special needs planning are the very basics of estate planning for families with minor children, and should serve as a jumping off point for further discussion with your estate planner.

Share on Facebook

Alzheimer’s Disease is a devastating illness which affects families all over the country; from the adult child who fears that her father’s recent forgetfulness might be a harbinger of something more sinister, to the elderly gentleman who wonders how he will possible pay for the care his beloved wife requires.

Over the years, the treatment received by Alzheimer’s patients has depended in part on how the disease is diagnosed; and according to this article from a New York Times blog, “new criteria [for diagnosis], unveiled on Tuesday by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association, will have consequences for family caregivers. Informed by research showing that changes in the brain may be under way a decade before any symptoms appear, the guidelines are likely to lead to increasingly early diagnoses.”

One of the most significant results of these new criteria is the establishment of three distinct stages of Alzheimer’s disease:

Pre-Clinical Dementia, wherein “There’s some biological or structural brain evidence that the Alzheimer’s process is under way, but the person’s not disabled and the family doesn’t notice any problem.”

Mild Cognitive Impairment, in which “someone has problems that don’t cause disability, but they’re evident enough that the patient and a family member or another observer agree, ‘Yes, it’s noticeable.’”

And finally, actual Dementia, which includes the signs and symptoms we all already associate with Alzheimer’s disease.

One of the most practical implications of these new criteria will be the early diagnosis—and thus the earlier treatment—of Alzheimer’s. The article mentions that these treatments are not yet curative, but there are medications that can help with the symptoms, and there is some evidence that “if you optimize the treatments for other diseases that make Alzheimer’s worse, like diabetes and heart disease, that increases the likelihood that Alzheimer’s will not accelerate.”

Perhaps of the most significance to elder law attorneys is the fact that early diagnosis can allow families to make the legal arrangements they need before the disease progresses to the point where it is too late. If the disease can be diagnosed in the Pre-Clinical stage, or even the stage of Mild Cognitive Impairment, the person receiving the diagnosis may have the time to consult with an attorney and put their affairs in order, helping to ensure that they—and their family—are provided for in the years ahead.

Share on Facebook

A new “Portability Provision” in The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Jobs Creation Act of 2010 has some couples excited about the financial possibilities. As explained in this article in the Wall Street Journal, the new portability provision “permits surviving spouses to elect to use the unused portion of the estate tax applicable exclusion amount of their predeceased spouses. This provides the surviving spouse with a larger exclusion amount and allows married couples to transfer a collective $10 million estate.”

The new provision may seem like a boon, but the author of the article advises caution for a few reasons: “First, portability may encourage procrastination rather than planning; second, complications emerge with GST taxes, remarriages, and state exclusions; and third, the temporary nature of the act and the unpredictability of Congress make for uncertainty in estate planning for the future.”

Our readers will know that there are a number of planning tools and opportunities that crop up over the years; this new portability provision is certainly one of them. Our readers will also know that none of these tools will necessarily be the “silver bullet” of estate planning. The fact is that estate planning is like anything else—to do it right and to do it effectively requires intelligence and research; a dedication of time and resources. Most families simply don’t have the time or the resources to devote to researching every new “perfect planning tool” that crops up promising to save your family money.

This is why our firm is here; it is our business to research the best planning tools for your family. We listen to your goals; we take into account your financial history and your current status. We help you create the plan that works best for you. If you think that this portability provision—or any other strategy you’ve heard about—might be your “silver bullet”, please call our office for an appointment. We can give you the resources and information you need to make an educated and effective plan for your family.

Share on Facebook

It’s all over the news lately that Prince William and his fiancé Kate Middleton will likely not sign a prenuptial agreement before the royal wedding on April 29^th. Although many reasons have been given as to why the couple will forgo signing a prenup, one of the reasons is that “while prenuptial agreements are common in the United States, they are far less prevalent in the UK. Only in the last year have British courts agreed to recognize such deals.” This is a statement that has some Americans asking exactly how legally binding are prenuptial agreements here in the States?

The answer to that question depends on a number of factors: your state of residence, the terms of your prenuptial agreement, how long you stay married, and more. Fortunately, the longer prenuptial agreements are around, and the more common they become, the more respect they get from the courts. But if you’re worried that your prenuptial agreement won’t hold up in court, here are few tips to help ensure the validity of your agreement.

Neither party must be signing under duress. The more time each party has to review the agreement before the wedding the better. Any prenuptial agreement signed the day of or the day before the wedding could be looked upon as being signed under duress.

The agreement should include full disclosure of income and assets. If you live in a state where it is possible to waive full disclosure of assets then BOTH parties should specify that they do so knowingly.

Each party should have their own legal representation. In order to be sure that neither party is being taken advantage of, each party should have their own independent attorney review the document before it is signed.

Details regarding children or child support in a prenuptial agreement may not be enforced by most courts. Partners my want to include details about possible custody or child support arrangements in a prenuptial agreement, but keep in mind that any court will always give the best interests of a child the highest priority, even if it means disregarding those sections of the agreement between spouses.

Of course, every couple hopes that a prenuptial agreement will never come into play, but these tips can help ensure that your agreement will be considered valid by a court if the worst should happen. Contact our office if you have any questions about prenuptial or marital agreements, we’d like to help.

Share on Facebook

The recent passing of Elizabeth Taylor has many wondering what will now happen with Ms. Taylor’s sizeable fortune? According to this article in Forbes Ms. Taylor’s fortune includes not only the millions she made in the Hollywood movie industry, but the even greater amount made she made with her fragrance line.

“In her most savvy business move, Taylor licensed her name to Elizabeth Arden and came out with several perfumes, including Passion, White Diamonds, and Black Pearls. Her fragrances have reaped a reported $200 million in sales over the years. Perfumes are one of the highest margin products out there, which is why celebrities love them. Taylor was doing it before anyone.”

Furthermore, a recent article in ABC News reports that Elizabeth Arden has no plans to discontinue the Taylor brand anytime soon. “White Diamonds remains a best seller almost 20 years after its 1991 introduction, a testimony to her transcendent and enduring appeal… Our best tribute to Elizabeth Taylor will be to continue the legacy of the brands she created and loved so much.”

The question now is, what will happen to this sizeable (and growing) fortune now that Ms. Taylor has passed away? ABC News has some guesses: “On the question of what could happen to her estate now that she has passed away, many speculate it will be distributed to her four children and 10 grandchildren [with whom she is reported to have been on good terms]… And Taylor most likely bequeathed a substantial amount of money to her charitable work. Taylor was a devoted AIDS activist, helping form the American Foundation for AIDS Research in 1985 and the Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation in 1991.”

Thus far no last will and testament has been released, which suggests that Ms. Taylor may have had a trust, an extensive document which protects your family and assets while remaining private. But given what we do know about Ms. Taylor, it is not unreasonable to believe that her estate will be split between her family and her charitable endeavors, especially the AIDS Foundations to which she gave so much in life.

Share on Facebook

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal shines the light on a new program being instituted by a growing number of states called “Physician-Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment,” or POLST. “A POLST, which is signed by both the patient and the doctor, spells out such choices as whether a patient wants to be on a mechanical breathing machine or feeding tube and receive antibiotics.”

Creating a POLST is an important step toward getting the care and medical treatment you want at a time when you may no longer be able to communicate those wishes to your family or medical staff. As estate planners we know just how important it is to communicate these preferences for health care; in fact, creating an estate plan with our office includes drafting a document called an advance directive, in which you specify which medical treatments or interventions you would or would not like, and more importantly, it is the document in which you nominate a health care agent to serve as your proxy if and when you are unable to speak for yourself.

Keep in mind that although the POLST is an important step in making your wishes known, the POLST is not intended to replace an advance directive. The POLST programs “are meant to complement advance directives, sometimes known as living wills, in which people state in broad terms how much medical intervention they will want when their condition no longer allows them to communicate.”

The WSJ article states that “A study supported by the National Institutes of Health last year found that patients with POLST forms were more likely to have treatment preferences documented than patients who used traditional documents such as living wills and do-not-resuscitate orders.“ This comes as no surprise, considering that executing a POLST includes getting the document signed by your doctor, thus ensuring that you doctor is not only aware that you’ve expressed your wishes for end-of-life care, but has also likely had a part in helping you understand exactly what your options are.

Our office recommends that our clients go one step further—in addition to having your doctor sign your POLST, give your doctor a copy of your advance directive as well. Once you have things squared away with your doctor we also recommend sending a copy of your POLST and your advance directive to the person you’ve named as your healthcare agent.

The more informed you doctors and family are about your wishes for end-of-life care, the more likely it is that you will receive the treatment you prefer.

Share on Facebook

Only a few days ago the world was shocked by the terrible earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Our hearts and prayers go out the people affected by the tragedy, and many people are asking what they can do to help.

The sudden violence of nature has many of us looking at our own situations as well, wondering if we are prepared—as a country and as individuals—should an equally devastating natural disaster strike our own shores. Of course the first thought most of us have in this regard is whether or not we have a well-stocked supply of emergency rations, but as this article from CBS MoneyWatch.com points out, there is much more to surviving a natural disaster than the first 24 hours. “Most people never think about the items to take that help protect your financial assets.”

Author Steve Vernon includes in his article a list of things you can do to prepare for what comes after the first 24 hours of a natural disaster, including:

• A stash of cash in case ATMs are shut down for a long period of time.
• Contact information for family members, close friends, and work contacts.
• A cell phone and charger, plus batteries and chargers for other necessary electronic equipment.
• A list of account numbers and contact information for all your regular bills and payment obligations.
• Your insurance company contact information.

These are only a few of the things you’ll want to have ready (or at least have thought about) if disaster strikes here at home.

Some natural disasters are so big in scope they are almost impossible to comprehend, let alone try to prepare for; but preparation is the best way to keep fear and panic at bay. It doesn’t help anybody to dwell too much on what “might happen,” but having a basic emergency plan in place gives you the freedom to go on with your everyday life, knowing that you’ve done what you can to be ready if disaster does strike.

For more information about disaster preparedness please visit the FEMA website here: FEMA Emergency Planning Checklists.

For more information about how you can help the disaster victims in Japan please check the Crisis Response Page on Google.

Share on Facebook

If you are the executor of the estate of a decedent who died in 2010 you may think you’re in the clear. After all, there was no estate tax in 2010 right? Making distributions should be a piece of cake. Wrong. Because of the estate tax election available on the estates of 2010 decedents, administering those estates will actually be more work than you may think.

The repeal of the estate tax in 2010 also brought with it a repeal of the “step up in basis,” meaning that heirs selling inherited assets were taxed based on the original acquisition cost of the assets, not on their value as of the date of the taxpayer’s death. This generally resulted in a higher tax paid on assets than the normal estate tax rate—not good for taxpayers. But 2010 estates don’t have to go by these rules. The legislation passed in December of 2010 gave 2010 estates the opportunity to elect whether they wanted to use the 2010 estate tax laws, or the new laws for 2011. This article in Forbes explains what this means:

“The 2010 Tax Relief Act restored the estate tax for individuals dying in 2010 with a $5 million per person exemption and a maximum rate of 35%. It also repealed the modified carryover basis rules for property acquired from a decedent who died in 2010. However, estates of individuals dying in 2010 can elect zero estate tax and the modified carryover basis rules that would have applied before they were repealed. That means the basis of assets acquired from the decedent would be the lesser of the decedent’s adjusted basis (carryover basis) or the fair market value of the property on the date of the decedent’s death.”

In general this tax election is a good thing, it allows executors to choose which tax formula will cost the beneficiaries the least in taxes; but it does mean a lot more paperwork and a lot more attention to detail. If you are the executor of an estate of a decedent who died in 2010, don’t hesitate to call us. We can answer your questions and help you explore your options.

Share on Facebook

Last month the Obama administration released their budget for the 2012 fiscal year, and included in that budget were a few things that retirees (or those close to retiring) will want to be aware of. If you own a business you may want to keep reading as well, as some of the proposals within the budget would affect not only retirees, but also small business owners. This article in the US News and World Report describes some of the proposals included in the budget, including:

Automatic workplace pensions. This would require employers (with the exception of very small businesses) that do not currently offer a retirement plan to enroll their employees in a direct-deposit IRA account. Employees would have the ability to opt-out if desired.

Tax incentives to create retirement plans. This proposal would increase the value of the tax credit to small businesses that start new retirement plans. The current maximum credit is $500/year for up to 3 years, the new proposal would increase that to $1000/year.

More Social-Security funding. Obama’s budget would allocate $12.5 billion to the Social Security Administration, up $1 billion since 2010. The primary aim of this increase would be to “reduce the backlog of disability claims and decrease Social Security fraud.”

But not all of the proposals included in the budget are beneficial to retirees. Here are a few things you may want to watch out for:

Pension insurance premium increases. “The budget proposes giving the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation… the authority to adjust premiums and take into account a company’s financial condition when setting premiums.” Although this is certain to result in premium increases, the increases would be gradually phased in.

Senior Community Service Employment Program funding cut. The proposed budget would reduce funding for the Senior Community Service Employment Program by 45 percent, and would transfer the program from the Department of Labor to the Department of Health and Human Services. Seniors who hope to retrain for new jobs in their retirement years may find this more difficult to do than they expected.

Share on Facebook